Under Questioning

Four ways to lose an argument, ranked by a Roman in AD 95 — and walked down in order by the defence at Nuremberg.

A course on the thought of Nuremberg.

Rhetoric

What you will learn

Course outline

  1. Where the dispute actually is — Before anyone argues, something has to be decided that is not part of the argument: what the argument is about. Quintilian says the failure to do this is the commonest fault in advocacy, and gives it…
  2. Whether it happened, and whether you knew — The lowest rung of the ladder is the strongest: deny it. At Nuremberg that rung was gone before the trial started, so the question of fact moved somewhere stranger — into the defendants' own heads.
  3. What to call it — On the same morning, in the same room, the tribunal considered two men whose entire offence consisted of words. It hanged one and acquitted the other, and the line it drew between them is still the…
  4. Granted, and here is why — The third rung concedes the act and the name and argues the act was right. Quintilian calls it the most honourable of the defences. At Nuremberg it produced the only argument the tribunal partly…
  5. You are the wrong court — The fourth ground is not about the act at all. Quintilian puts it last and calls it the only remaining hope of safety. The Nuremberg defence opened with it, on the first day, before a word of…
  6. Know your witness — Jackson's cross-examination of Göring is generally judged a failure. Quintilian, writing eighteen centuries earlier, had told him exactly what not to do — and the man who got it right was in the same…

Works read in this course

Terms introduced

stasis, conjecture, definition, quality, translatio, the defence ladder, responsiveness

Part of the Simposeum course library.